ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, August 06, 2017

Attacking dissent at Google

An anonymous Googler is providing evidence at Gab that various employees at Google are openly attacking James Damore, the author of the document dissenting from the SJW diversity doctrine there, and actively lobbying the executives to fire him, despite the fact that more than one-third of Googlers surveyed tend to agree with his dissent.
Paul and Sitaram are managers. Colm is a director with 101 full-time employees in his organization. Dave is a director with 242 full-time employees in his organization. These posts are from the internal version of the Google+ social network, which is limited to Googlers only.

Dozens of managers emailed their teams to smear the document's author for raising his concerns in the paper. Subsequently, the author received all manner of hate mail and threats from thousands of other employees. It was a coordinated mob attack and numerous managers were deliberately stoking the flames in order to punish him.

The pie charts show that a large share of Googlers agreed with James' points on an anonymous survey.  Hence the grave importance of maintaining control over the Narrative.
Google Leak #1
Google Leak #2
Google Leak #3
Google Leak #4
Google Leak #5
Google Leak #6
Google Leak #7

If anyone is going to be fired as a result of this, it should not be James Damore, who has a PhD in Biology from Harvard and therefore is unlikely to be opining in ignorance, but rather, the SJW co-workers who are demonstrating their complete lack of corporate professionalism. Nor is Damore alone in his rather mild criticism of the SJW excesses there. As always, the SJWs overestimate their strength, even in one of their most influential strongholds.

It should be mentioned, however, that at least up to this point, Google's response has been reasonable. The VP of Diversity has issued a statement that the organization stands by its insane SJW principles, which is a surprise to no one, but has also observed that "fostering a culture in which those with alternative views, including different political views, feel safe sharing their opinions". On the other hand, the caveat "that discourse needs to work alongside the principles of equal employment found in our Code of Conduct, policies, and anti-discrimination laws" does provide cover for anti-free speech action.

So, we'll see if Google wants to roll the dice by going full SJW while under fire from European governments and anti-trust scrutiny from the Trump administration. The smartest thing for them to do would be to do nothing, as they are not responsible for the personal or professional opinions of their employees, but their internal SJWs may not make that possible given the sheer number of them Google has collected.



UPDATE: More evidence that this is Best Timeline.

Julian Assange@JulianAssange
Identity politics 2.0 wars come to Google. Oh no. But mass spying is fine since its equal opportunity predation.


UPDATE: Welcome, Yes-At-Googlers

Welcome to the home of the Evil Legion of Evil.

I, Vox Day, the Supreme Dark Lord of said ELoE, am your humble host. Benvenuti. You need not worry about your physical safety being at risk, the Vile Faceless Minions are chained in their kennels, and muzzled, and have been provided sufficient SJW bones upon which to chew.

Let me assure you that as the bestselling author of SJWs Always Lie, I am perfectly aware that you have been lied to by your fellow Googlers about me and this site. This is not a site that incites harassment, quite to the contrary, as an American Indian who is regularly attacked and misraced and misrepresented and lied about, I am often a victim of SJW harassment.

Since I have been receiving death threats from your kind since 2001, when I first became a political columnist, you will forgive me if I am less than entirely impressed with your preening and posturing. And before you attempt to engage in the usual toothless social justice rhetoric, you may wish to keep in mind that I literally wrote the book on the subject.

As you were belatedly informed, your newsletter, of course, does not endorse the content here, so let this welcome serve as your trigger warning that here you will encounter people who:

  • do not agree with you
  • are actually more intelligent than you
  • are better-educated than you
  • and frankly find you to be tediously predictable and rendered functionally stupid, if not delusional, by your foolish social justice convergence.

But if you are polite and civil, I expect the Dread Ilk will treat you in a similarly polite and civil manner. And if you choose otherwise, well, as our guests, we are happy to permit you to establish the rules of engagement.

In certain confidence of the ultimate victory of the Legion, I am,

VD,
SDL
ELoE

Labels: ,

73 Comments:

Anonymous Alrenous August 06, 2017 5:41 AM  

It's not punishment per se, but encourager les autres. They intend to fire the first one to stop jeering along with Damore.

Anonymous Simplytimothy August 06, 2017 5:58 AM  

Got a good hashtag so I can tweet Google and start brawling! #IStandWithJamesDamore is my first attempt.

Blogger Shimshon August 06, 2017 6:00 AM  

So he's been outed. I can't find anything on that. Get that man a copy of the SJW Attack Survival Guide, stat!

Google: Don't be evil.

Supreme Dark Lord: Hold my beer (sucker punches).

OpenID aew51183 August 06, 2017 6:06 AM  

Notice the subtle rigging of that polls responses:
Notice they have "mostly disagree" and "strongly disagree", but for the agree side they have "almost agree", "strongly agree".

Now they get to claim this is part of the "disagreement" and that 70% of the organization disagrees when it's more like only 48.5

Anonymous Bobby Farr August 06, 2017 6:08 AM  

I wonder if the poll was taken before or after it became public knowledge that this guy was going to be skewered for his opinions. In any case, it is a clear sign that the SJWs need to run a tighter ship. Even the threat of public shaming and professional destruction was only sufficient to generate 50% support.

Blogger rumpole5 August 06, 2017 6:26 AM  

As a company that relies on the creative impulse (a predominently male item) as its stock in trade, Google had better slap these puritanical bitches down or it is doomed. More's the pity, because the low T brainy nerdy type of guy who works at a place like Google is already extremely lenient with these SJW Nazi Gynos. It probably is a paradise for the nasty, lazy, incompetents. They should stfu and enjoy the ride. The problem for these horrible women is that even under the influence of the blue pill, many high IQ guys are too intelligent to ignore basic biological facts and reality.

Anonymous buddy August 06, 2017 6:36 AM  

haha google management is stuck here. on one side the purple hairs are demanding blood, on the other google's reputation is in jeopardy, as this has blown up, and firing the digital Martin Luther would martyr him. now we wait.

Anonymous Mathias August 06, 2017 6:37 AM  

Well, it seems for our sort, the goal here should be to make sure that these women force the issue, as it would backfire spectacularly with the factors VD has already mentioned. Anyone up for some goading?

Blogger Stilicho August 06, 2017 6:38 AM  

Googles' practices as outlined by Damore in his critique are a recipe for a slow decline followed by a quick collapse. Google's real challenge is keeping enough white men on board to keep things running and to make up for the unqualified diversidross that Google keeps hiring or promoting beyond their abilities.

A company so infected by diversity cannot recover, so it is really a matter of when it reaches critical huddled mass and explodes. It will take years without outside pressure, but it is inevitable.

Blogger red clock August 06, 2017 6:44 AM  

Everyone knows tech jobs are filled with white and Asian guys. No amount of SJW shrieking will suddenly flood tech companies with African hijabis.

But they use any outcome disparities to openly and viciously deny employment/admission to qualified white men. That's what the entire diversity racket is all about.

Blogger Ceerilan August 06, 2017 6:50 AM  

The best response to the naming of James Damore is the naming of the SJW Google employees who are attacking him, followed by an organized documenting and publicizing of their actions. This isn't about saving James Damore, that's likely impossible. But it will provide a cost to the SJW witch hunters.

Anonymous I'm Not a Fascist. But My Sons Are. August 06, 2017 6:53 AM  

His name was James Damore.

Blogger red clock August 06, 2017 6:54 AM  

Is it perhaps this James Damore? A Harvard alumni, software engineer at Google. https://sysbiophd.harvard.edu/people/alumni/james-damore

Anonymous Lawyer Guy August 06, 2017 7:03 AM  

I was one of hundreds of outside local counsel for a very large retailer in the mid00s. Lots of SJW from the regional managers up to the CEO crept in as they hired Ivy League only and got away from their hard working Southern management roots.

New CEO started caring about environment more than profits, promoting women of color was over their heads, and enacted quotas for outside professionals. It got so bad we had one of the litigation guys, Black, 'check my work' so we could bill his time. My disabled Veteran status helped, but not enough.

Do you know how few Black civil engineers there are, and how much the firms had to pay them to work some hours on the new store plans?

So this crap went on for years, until it started slightly impacting the stock price. Then the family members of the dead founder cleaned house.

Anyways, things will get a lot worse there, until the value goes down, then it will get fixed.

Anonymous idiocraties August 06, 2017 7:06 AM  

Clearly google people are consuming the samizdat trifecta of Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin, the gateways to the Alt Right.

Cant stop the signal at this point. The side that is strengthened with free flow of information will always win over the side that is weakened by the free low of information.

Anonymous JAG August 06, 2017 7:18 AM  

#GoogleGate I guess...

Blogger Stilicho August 06, 2017 7:28 AM  

@11 Ceerilan. Good point. Expose them, ridicule them, isolate them... make employment of them or association with them more expensive and troublesome than any virtue-signaling leftist points Google gets from them are worth.

Anonymous Simplytimothy August 06, 2017 7:28 AM  

#GoogleManifesto appears to be the sjw thread

Anonymous Bobby Farr August 06, 2017 7:37 AM  

Their laments re his "bigotry" are hilarious. Of course, it is lost on them that they are proving his point.

Blogger VD August 06, 2017 7:50 AM  

Is it perhaps this James Damore?

It does appear to be, yes.

Anonymous Looking Glass August 06, 2017 8:05 AM  

If Google was really smart, they'd fire the diversity VP and the managers organizing the lynch mob, but we know that isn't likely. Thus their next "best" course is to offer James $20 million to retire somewhere warm. The Lynch Mob that's formed establishes: Hostile Work Environment, Sex Discrimination, Race Discrimination and Illegal Quotas. Along with multiple individual cases of Slander & Defamation that are sure to crop up.

The top brass better pay to make him go away or the company is going to be paying for this for ages. Plus, Lord, I want an epic Trump Tweet on this. Just thinking about that makes me happy. :)

Anonymous Looking Glass August 06, 2017 8:07 AM  

That graph is really interesting, though, as Google is a Leftists la-la land. Even there, getting 50% to disagree with something that should only hurt their feelings is hard. I guess that means only 1/2 of the place will need helicopter rides.

Anonymous basementhomebrewer August 06, 2017 8:17 AM  

HR Vp was bad enough the fact that major Corps have started hiring diversity VPs is disgusting. Its like paying an executives salary to an anti-executive. A Vampire that feeds on profit, progress and organizational efficiency

Blogger Avalanche August 06, 2017 8:35 AM  

@11 "the naming of the SJW Google employees who are attacking him, followed by an organized documenting and publicizing of their actions."

Oh! This, SO MUCH this! Is there a 'branch' (okay, a slavering pack of attack-autistes?! Go boys go!) of 4Chan for corporate malfeasance, such as there is for political malfeasance? I HOPE so!

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener August 06, 2017 8:38 AM  

If the SJWs feel they can't fire Mr. Damore outright, they will do their best to make the remainder of his time at Google as unpleasant as possible. People have started winning lawsuits against companies for anti-white bigotry, so Mr. Damore should be collecting as much relevant evidence of their hostility, and Google's indifference to it, as possible.

And if the SJWs as Google have no problem doxing him, he should return the favor.

Blogger Daniel August 06, 2017 8:41 AM  

All of those sound gay to me. But that perhaps is because i am an argentinian. Loco dejate de hinchar las pelotas ponganse a laburar

Blogger Dave August 06, 2017 8:42 AM  

Preseason football starts Wednesday night unless you count the Hall of Fame game, and really, who does? The weekend needed some free entertainment and this little skirmish at Google fit the bill perfectly.

Gab is paying off handsomely as Google employees feel safe to comment anonymously there.

Also a suggestion for a new title: "VP of Diversity, Integrity & Governance" (VP-DIG). Now who was it that had commented on fun titles; whose name escapes me.

'Nuff said.

Blogger mark auld August 06, 2017 8:47 AM  

Time for GAB or some outfit like them to start working on a new anti google. alternatives are needed.

Blogger Daniel August 06, 2017 8:49 AM  

The ones voting for "its complicated" should be counted as agreement

Anonymous Bobby Farr August 06, 2017 8:54 AM  

@11 aren't the already outing themselves in the messages posted on Gab?

Anonymous Basket of Deplorables August 06, 2017 9:05 AM  

Google is currently a major and powerful enemy of civilization. They will never be an ally, but this could be a useful opportunity to take them most of the way to an irrelevant neutral. It cannot be James, the author, but someone with the ability to gain access needs to get his email inbox, and filter for the most horrific emails (we all know they're there) and expose the SJWs within the organization publicly. Google will not likely fire them, but we need to make them unemployable post google.
Being 'from google' is a huge plus in silicon valley, we need to pivot that to 'Oh your from google, let me check the googlegate list....sorry not interested' for the SJW enforcers. If this provides the ability to drive the worst of the high IQ/skilled SJWs from silicon valley, it would be a big win for the forces of civilization.

Their nasty note to the author needs to be part of every future interview they ever have. And if any company gets past that...they were already hopelessly converged. But this could make it ever so slightly easier to slow the spread of convergence.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan August 06, 2017 9:09 AM  

Taunting SJW, did any conservative intellectual ever think it would be so much fun?

Hell NO! But the alt-right broke that seal, and now the bow tied sour puss window licking intellectual spergs are close to being out of a job.

It will get even better when the coalition of the fringes breaks up when the Glorious People of Color figure out they no longer need much less benefit being tied up with purple haired land whale white women of uncertain mental health. Do Indian men love white women with purple hair?

Blogger Unknown August 06, 2017 9:55 AM  

I am surprised that it leaked. All Googlers know, you leak anything internal ever, you are fired, no matter what.

Blogger Ceerilan August 06, 2017 10:32 AM  

@30 We should be documenting and publicizing this information in an easily digestible format for HR companies to use.

@24 There is nothing stopping you from organizing this.

Anonymous basementhomebrewer August 06, 2017 10:50 AM  

There is an interesting lesson here for anyone who may find themselves in a position where they are asked, and given the power to, unconverge an organization. If the organization is sufficiently large you could fabricate an employee and falsify credit to working on various projects. Then put out a memo similar to this from that employee. Watch the rats come out of the wood work for a couple weeks and take notes. Then start passing out pink slips to all of them. Don't bother to give them a reason because if they suspect that it was due to their comments the other SJWs who were smart enough to stay silent will go stealth and dig themselves in deeper.

Anonymous A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents August 06, 2017 11:09 AM  

@9 Stilcho
Google's real challenge is keeping enough white men on board to keep things running and to make up for the unqualified diversidross that Google keeps hiring or promoting beyond their abilities.

Google is western civilization on a small scale.

Blogger Lovekraft August 06, 2017 11:19 AM  

This, parsed down for the middle- and lower-class voting female base (essential to win next election):

"Google push for diversity and inclusiveness met with strong and hateful comments by notorious alt-right blogger."

To teh wimminz, I would submit:

"A dangerous attempt to subvert fundamental principles of our society was headed off by our brave patriot Kekistanis."

Blogger Were-Puppy August 06, 2017 11:21 AM  

In honor of James epic efforts, it would be glorious to find some way to help him make the rubble bounce.

Blogger ace August 06, 2017 11:28 AM  

What a smorgasbord of well reasoned argumentation. Let's examine our candidates and see if we can find a single bit of merit.

Paul
"monstrous pile of bullshit"
"feels uncomfortable"
"profoundly disappointed"
"unacceptable"
"I am crushed"
"execrable views"
"denunciation and excoriation"
"trashfire" (nuclear level insult for them)
"personal worth and feelings"
"heartbreaking"

Pure feels

Sitaram
"madness"
"horrible, bigoted"
"widespread hurt"
"dangerous"

Burn the heretic

Colm
"I do not want people to feel safe to share [these views]"
"my friends terror"
"violently offensive"
"you deserve what's coming to you"
"I intend to silence these views"

Basic tyrant

Dave:
"[it's not important] whether the cited sources are accurate"
"I don't think their veracity is important when [the sources] are used so shoddily"
"I'm not engaging the arguments" (If he doesn't engage them, how can he say they--never mind.)
"lazy straw man" (gives no reason)
"it's premises and citations don't support its conclusions" (provides no examples)
"[the author is either insidious or] a naive person who doesn't appear to have a lot of real-world experience"
"the assumptions and conclusions come to in the doc are wrong and garbage"
"incumbent on us to [...] call this shit out"
"shitty opinions"
"intellectually lazy, biased, and unkind"

Inept pseudo-dialectic

Anthony:
"punching nazis had a fine tradition"
"everyone [who agrees with this essay] needs to get in the bin"
"They're Nazis. No."
"because Nazis"
"you should absolutely punch Nazis"

Diagnosis: Lack of self-awareness

And my personal favorite:

Joel
"the author will bring their bigotry to their evaluation of candidates" (everything else he claims follows from this unproven charge)
"undermines the inclusive environment"
"irreparable harm"
"bigoted worldview"
"if we [retain him] we are declaring that we give up on diversity"

Wew. I'm honestly impressed. Joel is insidious and evil, like the Devil. It's chilling how he manages to frame it like firing the man will be doing him a favor, which pre-emptively absolves him and anyone else involved of any guilty feelings for the injustice he is advocating. This one is the most dangerous.

I like this cross section we have here. What's with their obsession with trash, trash people, dumpster/trash fires anyway? It's certainly a concise and effective way to dehumanize someone. It's like they are hyping themselves up for a good old fashioned purge but forgot the part where they didn't manage to disarm us first.

Blogger Were-Puppy August 06, 2017 11:34 AM  

This whole lot are good candidates for the sjwlist.

Anonymous Just another commenter August 06, 2017 11:52 AM  

Hey , watching a corporation commit seppuku in real time might be fun to watch, since I've not liked their anti-Americanism, spying, and collusion with government for several years. Let's hope they double down and make a great deal of talent available to the Alt-Right by offering generous severance packages... and even larger lawsuit payouts.

Blogger DJ|Bonky August 06, 2017 11:57 AM  

Unless one works in an area directly related to ideology and it's evangelization, who has time to write this stuff? Whether it be the OPer of the 10page manifesto or even this short essay (relative) response by Joel, I just don't get it. Is this what life allows for when you're a highly paid gog in a corporate machine and you have no kids? Lately, I've been trying to squeeze 70hrs of work (as a director at a <20 employee tech Co) into a 50hr week just so I can spend 2hrs a night and each weekend with my wife and 4kids. I barely have time to read this stuff (as entertaining as it is), but to actually write it!? Madness.

Anonymous Just another commenter August 06, 2017 12:12 PM  

@35 - sort of a Captain Tuttle operation. That could be fun.

Blogger SirGroggy August 06, 2017 12:20 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 06, 2017 12:22 PM  

@Ceeeilan

That is encompassed by an already existing project called the SJW List. It's a Wiki. All it takes to qualify is attempting to harm the employment of someone else for not being an SJW.

As you find the names, add them to the list.

Blogger Carl Philipp August 06, 2017 12:32 PM  

Lol. Look at the second pie chart (fifth link).

"The document is harmful and shouldn't have been shared" is even more a minority position than the document is.

Best timeline.

Blogger weevil eleatic August 06, 2017 12:52 PM  

this is the only source on what his name is. stop doxing him.

Blogger Resident Moron™ August 06, 2017 1:02 PM  

I share an office with an Irishman, otherwise I'd be insane and/or fired already.

I can't believe a senior manager admits over corporate email that reading that message left him totally unproductive for two days.

That's writing your resignation letter as far as I'm concerned. Google may yet be profitable for a long time to come, but if it tolerates this kinds of idiocy as a matter of course then its fall will be as brutally swift as the USSR's ...

Blogger tz August 06, 2017 1:16 PM  

The hate mail directed at the author is classic hostile work environment stuff and violates more policies than they can make up on the author.
Will google fire them?

Anonymous idiocraties August 06, 2017 1:20 PM  

Google is a world leader in AI, will saner minds prevail and simply automate 80% of google's workforce? Remove people and you remove the drama, the the butthurt and the SJWs

I can see it being an obvious driver for automation.

Blogger VD August 06, 2017 1:45 PM  

this is the only source on what his name is. stop doxing him.

Everyone at Google knows who he is. Obviously. Also, IT'S NOT DOXING to identify the author of a document.

Blogger xstek99 August 06, 2017 1:55 PM  

Fire everyone with purple hair. It's the greater good. And I have normal hair.

Anonymous logprof August 06, 2017 2:05 PM  

I used to think that Assange was a douche, and maybe he is, but now I know at least he's not *just* a douche, but a frequent bearer of truth.

Blogger Sillon Bono August 06, 2017 2:58 PM  

A Most Deplorable Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents wrote:@9 Stilcho

Google's real challenge is keeping enough white men on board to keep things running and to make up for the unqualified diversidross that Google keeps hiring or promoting beyond their abilities.

Google is western civilization on a small scale.


In most organisations 20% of the people do 80%+ of the work, Google only need 20% white/asian employees to continue operating with more or less success.

Blogger John Morris August 06, 2017 3:45 PM  

It is a certainty the guy's stuff is already in a cardboard box at the front and his network access and id card are dead.

And if he didn't realize this was the only outcome possible he ain't smart enough for Google. Staying anonymous in the heart of the surveillance beast isn't an option. So we can assume he knew the consequences and thought the need for somebody to step up justified throwing himself on the grenade.

The question Google management should be asking is what is on his encrypted flash drives. How much dirt can he dish?

Blogger Roger G2 August 06, 2017 3:50 PM  

It's almost 4pm and I'm getting that "no results for your search" nonsense from Twitter. That didn't last long.

Blogger Daniel H August 06, 2017 4:17 PM  

What the hell is up with those survey options? Strongly Agree and then Almost Agree? And then Mostly Disagree and Strongly Disagree?

Clearly whoever made the poll was biased.

Blogger Robert What? August 06, 2017 6:27 PM  

The only Google employee I know is thoroughly SJW. Which is interesting since he is from eastern Europe and you'd think that he would be more conservative leaning. The Dark Side of the Force must be strong at Google.

Anonymous harvardanon August 06, 2017 7:26 PM  

I despise SJWs too, but just wanted to provide a quick fact check: The author does not have a PhD; he "left" his PhD program in part due to fallout from a department-wide presentation where he discussed masturbating to his female colleagues.

Anonymous Post Alley Crackpot August 06, 2017 9:13 PM  

Google is a US public utility that is engaging in monopolistic and anti-competitive behaviour, one that should be broken up for it. Portions of Google that operate for the public benefit should be converted into US public utility companies with limited purposes, and they should operate entirely under US law as much as possible.

More specifically, I don't have a problem with regulatory takings when it comes to Google not because the company in question deserves it (which is essentially true), but because the property they've acquired is the result of this anti-competitive behaviour.

The fact that there are SJWs there who would swarm someone working within that company who would speak the truth simply adds evidence that this is the case.

The swarming behaviour of SJWs is always an indicator of anti-competitive behaviour, and should be treated as such.

Blogger Weatherlea August 06, 2017 10:31 PM  

While that sniffs plausible, especially given the autistic-ish nature of the authors post ya got anything closer to fact (eg, "I was there and... ")

Blogger James Dixon August 06, 2017 10:54 PM  

> So we can assume he knew the consequences and thought the need for somebody to step up justified throwing himself on the grenade.

I thought that went without saying. No one does anything like this unless they're ready to leave.

Anonymous harvardanon August 06, 2017 11:01 PM  

@Weatherlea: The event occurred at a retreat and the conflict stemmed from the fact that the department wanted an apology while the author felt he did nothing wrong. Though SJW excesses in Silicon Valley need to be exposed, this guy isn't the right guy to stand behind.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 07, 2017 12:16 AM  

harvardanon wrote:Though SJW excesses in Silicon Valley need to be exposed, this guy isn't the right guy to stand behind.
Fuck you. Useless losers like you are the ones who tried so hard to kill Milo.
Anyone willing to stand up and speak the truth is the right guy.
Anyone.
Go back to your Harvard GOP club and don't bother coming back until you're ready to win.

Anonymous Anonymous August 07, 2017 12:55 AM  

For the record, James never got his PhD from Harvard. He left a couple of years in without a PhD.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 07, 2017 1:20 AM  

Okay, at this point it's an organized "correct the record" effort by some SJW organization.

Anonymous Post Alley Crackpot August 07, 2017 7:39 AM  

I don't give a crap whether or not this guy got a Piled Higher and Deeper degree in Underwater Basket Weaving from the University of the Almighty Scuba Tank ...

Res ipsa loquitur ... he's not the one at fault, and he hasn't been negligent.

I couldn't give a flying fling at a flaming doughnut whether the "fact checking" of these people appears to feeble minds to imply otherwise.

They have no standing, and we should help remind them of that.

Blogger Strelnikov August 07, 2017 4:14 PM  

Well, I certainly am evil enough, based on what the SJW establishment says about me here and there, so I guess I better join the ELoE.

Anonymous Anonymous August 08, 2017 1:27 PM  

Tried sending a link to this article to a friend on Twitter and it is being blocked. I managed to send it through using a link shortener, but it only works once. I love how they have the nerve to call us fascists.

Anonymous Anonymous August 10, 2017 9:20 PM  

Why do you hate women so much? Have you been rejected a lot?

Blogger Mr. Maple Mugwump August 10, 2017 10:24 PM  

Cool story bro. Btw, Jimmy "Long Face" Damore doesn't have a PhD from Harvard. Wonder what other skeletons are in his closet...LOL

Blogger Drael64 August 12, 2017 8:01 AM  

The amusing thing is, why damore is considering legal action, so is a group accusing google of gender discrimination (mah wage gap). So they are going to have to argue both a) the distribution at google of pay and jobs is entirely organic and b) damore is wrong, they need diversity programs, and what he said is sexist.

They will basically be arguing both opposing sides, trying to cover up their illegal hiring practices, whilst explaining why under 20 percent women, under 1 percent female management, and an overall lower amount of pay is entirely organic and not distriminantion AND have to somehow not contradict themselves.

I'm really hoping both parties pursue lawsuits, because the hilarity of google trying to argue both sides of this, without contradicting themselves, will be more awkward and ridiculous than the classic sitcom "person on two dates at the same time".

Blogger Drael64 August 12, 2017 8:06 AM  

And the funniest thing yet - which would be better to lose, mah wage gap, or damore. Well, DUH. Obviously having a little flash in the pan press over a employees opinion, is better than losing a sexual discrimination case (or having your illegal hiring practices exposed) - both of which could cost serious money, and A LOT of bad press.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts